Citation:
Date Published:
NovAbstract:
Strains of D. melanogaster, representing a range of genetic diversity, were systematically subjected to each of several techniques that have been devised to assess total or net fitness. All of these techniques operationally define fitness in terms of reproductive success under competitive conditions. For the set of strains tested, an excellent correlation was obtained between the competitive indices produced by two single-generation intraspecific competitions, despite fundamental differences in the strains used as competitive standards. The results of two interspecific tests were also correlated, but the intraspecific vs. interspecific test result comparisons ranged from highly significant to nonsignificant correlations. For the fitness estimates, the overall variances produced by the intraspecific tests were greater than those obtained in the interspecific competitions. No significant correlations were found between the results of a long-term (multi-generation) competitive assessment of fitness and any of the single-generation tests. Therefore, although all of these tests refer to a net parameter called "fitness", they are clearly not all measuring the same thing. Differences in the competitive interactions operative in each technique are suggested to account for these results.
Notes:
Haymer, D SHartl, D Leng1982/11/01 00:00Genetics. 1982 Nov;102(3):455-66.